It has published an analysis this week of the findings of its public consultation, which looked into the practice of cash retention in public and private sector construction contracts in Scotland.
The Scottish government said that responses to the consultation along with its stakeholder event held on 5th March have helped to provide a greater understanding of the issues associated with the practice of cash retention in construction contracts in Scotland. Its statement said: 鈥淲e will use the outputs from both to help inform our work in this area and we will form a short life working group to carefully consider the emerging policy options including; the possibility of a retention deposit scheme, the phasing out of retentions completely or the viability of alternative mechanisms of assurance.鈥�
Almost all respondents to the consultation agreed that 鈥榮ome form of assurance is needed in construction contracts鈥�, with only 6% disagreeing.
However, a majority of respondents thought that the current practice of cash retention was not 鈥榯he best form of assurance within construction contracts鈥�.
The majority of respondents fully agreed or partially agreed that a 鈥榬etention deposit scheme鈥� and/or holding retentions in trust could eliminate some of the critical issues associated with their use and provide surety against defects.
It illustrated the benefits and challenges with retentions, in particular understanding the extent to which this practice has positive but also negative impacts and what solutions would be effective and proportionate in addressing these.
The consultation received 33 responses, 25 of which were from organisations - mostly subcontractors and clients. There were 8 responses from individuals.
Got a story? Email news@theconstructionindex.co.uk
