Providence Building Services stood accused of being a 鈥渢rigger happy contractor鈥� that 鈥渏umped the gun鈥� during the contract termination process. It has now been vindicated in the court of appeal.
East Grinstead-based Providence Building Services fell into conflict with a client Hexagon Housing Association Limited in December 2022 over payment of invoices. The dispute escalated and by May 2023 Providence had walked off the job. Hexagon disputed Providence鈥檚 right to quit.
In November 2023 the Technology & Construction Court TCC ruled that, under the terms of the amended JCT Design and Build Contract 2016, it was necessary that Providence had accrued the right to terminate its employment. The judge, Adrian Williamson, ruled in favour of Hexagon. [See previous report here.]
Providence鈥檚 application for permission to appeal was initially denied but last week the case was finally ruled on by the appeal court 鈥� in Providence鈥檚 favour.
Darren Tancred, managing director of Providence Building Services, said: 鈥淭he recent litigation between Providence v Hexagon has seen Providence Building Services being forced to sway from its core values of working alongside its clients to achieve a mutually successful project for the client, the project consultants and its subcontractors. The process, since 18th May 2023, has been damaging for the business, but we remained certain that our interpretation of the contract clauses was correct. The three Court of Appeal judges agreed with us and found unanimously in Providence鈥檚 favour,聽 re-enforcing Lord Denning鈥檚 famous message that 鈥榗ash flow is the life blood of the construction industry鈥�.
鈥淒espite assertions made in recent publications, this simply was not a case of contractor being 鈥榯rigger happy鈥�. It was a warning to employers, who have only a few fundamental obligations and with payment in accordance with the contract condition being one of them. In this case the employer, Hexagon Housing Association, cynically and persistently ignored their payment obligations, whilst expecting Providence to continue to perform its obligations to its full extent. Hexagon鈥檚 actions left Providence with no alternative but to revert to the contract and to terminate its employment with Hexagon following 21 late payments beyond the final date of payment. It should be noted that Hexagon had already granted themselves additional time to make payments from the JCT 2016 contract by amending payment terms from 14 to 28 days.
鈥淲hen the matter of persistent late payment was bought to the attention of Hexagon and their team (along with enacting other remedies) it simply fell on deaf ears. This was particularly frustrating when in the time of industry decline, when ensuring that your supply chain was paid on time to ensure it was fed and watered with upmost importance to us. Hexagon took a different view on the importance of this time and time again.
鈥淪ubsequently, Providence was left with no alternative and took the difficult, 鈥榥uclear鈥� decision to terminate their employment under the contract, to ensure its supply chain was protected from Hexagon鈥檚 continued payment abuse. In most similar cases the supply chain tends to become the collateral damage in the employer鈥檚 poor payment practises.鈥�
Got a story? Email news@theconstructionindex.co.uk
