Campaign group Rights:Community:Action was set up last month and immediately engaged law firm Leigh Day to apply for a judicial review of the use of statutory instruments to bring in the changes to planning laws.
This claim for judicial review will heard at a 鈥榬olled up鈥� hearing in the High Court sitting as a Divisional Court next month.
The rolled-up hearing means that two judges will hear the group鈥檚 application for permission to apply for judicial review, which if successful, would lead into a hearing of the application for judicial review. A listing before the Divisional Court is a recognition of the significance of the case, Leigh Day said.
Naomi Luhde-Thompson from Rights: Community: Action (RCA) said: 鈥淭he judge鈥檚 order is encouraging because it recognises that the case is significant and needs to be heard promptly. RCA鈥檚 claim will proceed on all the grounds, challenging the government鈥檚 failure to undertake environmental or equalities assessment and its failure to properly consult before making the rules.聽 The changes brought in by these statutory instruments will have huge ramifications for planning and development across the country. Our challenge to these new planning rules seeks to put a pause on the new statutory instruments so that they can be properly considered.鈥�
RCA has decided not to pursue its application for interim relief in light of the court鈥檚 decision to list the case for hearing on an expedited basis.
From Monday 31st August the statutory instruments have changed planning law in England to the effect that planning permission is not required for a wider range if building jobs. Change of use for several kinds of building will no longer require planning permission.
New storeys above an existing dwelling-house will be able to be added without planning permission (permitted development).
And a detached building, used for offices or industry, can be demolished and replaced with flats within the same footprint, but up to two storeys higher, up to a maximum height of 18 metres.
The RCA claim is on the following grounds:
- The failure to carry out an environmental assessment of the statutory instruments is a breach of Article 3 of the EU strategic environmental assessment directive because they amount to plans or programmes for the purposes of the directive.
- The statutory instruments were introduced without an appropriate equality impact assessment, which is a failure to comply with a public sector equality duty under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010.
- Communities secretary Robert Jenrick has failed to take account of previous consultation responses and the advice of his own experts on the , which according to established principles, must be 鈥渃onscientiously taken into account鈥�.
Leigh Day solicitor Tom Short said: 鈥淩CA believes that the manner in which these reforms have been brought in means they have not undergone proper scrutiny, despite the obvious detrimental impacts they are likely to have. Our client is therefore delighted that they have granted a rolled-up hearing before the Divisional Court and that their case will be heard in a matter of weeks.鈥�
RCA has also been granted costs protection under the Aarhus rules for environmental claims.
[See our previous report on this issue here.]
Got a story? Email news@theconstructionindex.co.uk
