In a letter to The Daily Telegraph today he suggests that 鈥渢here is a compelling logic to having a central spine to distribute the power up and down the country鈥� and HS2, even if the Manchester line is cancelled, provides the perfect opportunity.
He writes: 鈥淎mid growing calls for HS2 to be scrapped, possibly in its entirety, in the wake of escalating costs, delays and proposed cuts to routes north of Birmingham, can I make an appeal for some lateral thinking?
鈥淲ith much of the construction under way, or in some instances actually completed, why don鈥檛 we use the route to lay down the cabling infrastructure needed to support the anticipated growth in demand for electricity across the country?
鈥淪ome estimates suggest that electric cars and vans alone could increase demand for electricity by up to 100 terawatt hours by 2050. As we鈥檙e all going to be consuming a lot more electricity in the future, there is a compelling logic to having a central spine to distribute the power up and down the country. The spine is already there 鈥� it鈥檚 called HS2. In the same way as railway lines were installed beside canals in the 19th century, it makes sense to lay new, much-needed, better electricity infrastructure alongside a route that has already been opened up by the construction of HS2. Indeed, former power stations along the route 鈥� Rugeley in Staffordshire, for example 鈥� could be reconfigured or repurposed to distribute the power from the spine around the grid, if necessary.
鈥淟ateral thinking is needed to secure some value from the considerable investment that has already been made in this project.鈥�
Got a story? Email news@theconstructionindex.co.uk
